Tom Dobbie A6570DD
2017 Application to Remove guilty plea.
Objectives. 12th May 2017
Chester Crown Court REGINA v Tom Dobbie
In order for justice to be done.
The Criminal Procedure Rules: Part 38 as in force on 6 Oct 2014 and supplied to the defendant as litigant in person on 4th April 2017 in his first time allowed to speak to the court.
3. (a). Explain why it would be unjust for the guilty plea to remain unchanged.
(b) . Indicate what, if any evidence the applicant wishes to call.
(c) . Identify any proposed witnesses; and
(d) . Indicate whether legal professional privilege is waived, specifying any material name and date.
The Application................................................................
(a)+(b).
1. There never was a guilty plea, only a conditional plea. See letters, solicitor instructions and direct to the court.
2. The defendant was prevented from addressing the court as to the reality of what was happening and agreed, even though he tried very hard
3. The defendant was misrepresented by the defence, with the defence behaving more like the prosecution.
Archbold 2016 4-381 SAYS - "It is the duty of counsel when defending an accused of a criminal charge, to present to the court, FEARLESSLY and without regards to his personal interests, the defence of the accused. It is not his function to determine the truth or falsity of that defence.
3.1.
Even the reply to the COB by the barrister was grossly perverting the course of justice. She knew it was acting to cover up child rape, child sexual abuses, child battering’s and many other crimes, but she avoided commenting on these matters.
3.2. She even admitted there were grounds for abuse of process - in writing.
3.3. Right from the start, the barrister and CPS were colluding on a guilty plea, without evidence even having been seen. The first look at the absolute bulk of evidence (located on the hard drive supplied to Cobleys for barrister, CPS and judge) was 20th March - after the supposed pleading !).
3.4. Mr Dobbie repeatedly informed the defence, CPS, judge of the defective indictments and to apply to quash and conduct a judicial review - eg 10/02/2017 10/02/2017part2 to Cobleys.
4. The defendant was coerced to sign a document that did not represent what was agreed in meetings. The defendant repeatedly informed the solicitors, barrister, cps and judge.
5. CPS and barrister worked together to mislead the court.
6. The entire trial is an abuse of process, abuse of power, to cover up child rape, child sexual abuses, child batterings and many other crimes.
7. Theextensive evidence, supporting the defendants innocence, and thecriminality heaped on himby Cheshire Police, CPS, Social Services was ignored in entirety, while CPS and defence conspired to coerce the defendant to plead guilty.
7.1.
The police, CPS and defence knew their position was unlawful in misleading the court.
8. Seven NHS psychiatrists verified in writing that the defendant was not deluded, and his beliefs are fully evidenced and witnessed. The defendant’s severe psychological anxiety and distress being fully attributable to years of abusive and criminal treatment of his children and himself.
9. The Overriding Objective of Justice (Archbold 4-114) states -
1.1. To act justly
2(a) Acquit the innocent and convict the guilty.
2(b) To act efficiently and expeditiously.
Now consider if the overriding objective of justice has been grossly criminally defeated by Chester CPS and Cheshire police - see OROJ17/1/17B and OROJ17/1/17Bpart2 and BBRD130417Bpart1 and BBRD130417Bpart2 .
Since the involvement of Cheshire Police in assaulting Mr Dobbie in 2006 and then, in assisting Catherine Avril Dobbie in her crimes against the children, her stepson, her husband, the Crown in 2006 and then all the way through 2010 to 2017, there has been gross abuse of police power and abuse of process. This statement is backed up by reality and a large amount of evidence that Cheshire police and CPS are desperate to hide. That Mr Dobbie opposes the efforts of Cheshire police to abuse his children while the police act criminally. This explains the large number of arrests and court appearances and no convictions. The psychlogical damage to the children and Mr Dobbie is enormous - verified by 7 NHS clinical Psychiatrists.
9.2. Another example is when Mr Dobbie was found not guilty in front of Judge Woodward in 2015 for trumped up charges by the criminals against the victim. CPS tried to still cover their tracks in an abuse of process to gag Mr Dobbie. At the aftermath of the 4 day trial, realising they had lost yet again, CPS then unlawfully applied for an injunction in a 5 min ad hoc meeting. See Archbold 2016 19-358d. CPS would have known this was unlawful (as they are experts), and so CPS had yet again perverted the course of justice and used the power of the court for abuse.
9.3. CPS and police knew that in every case, Mrs Dobbie was evidenced as a child abuser , and as assaulting Mr Dobbie. Irrespective of this, CPS kept with their original error, and spiralled into more criminality in order to try and cover up their crimes. CPS and Cheshire police have gone to considerable effort, and probably around £2Million, to assist Mrs Dobbie and Ken Redman to abuse the children, abuse her husband, destroy his business, steal possession of the house, steal the full equity of the house using fraudulant documents that cover up child rape and child batterings (in an ex parte hearing ! ), make Mr Dobbie mentally ill, torture Mr Dobbie, make him homeless, destroy ALL of his finances --- and then in a CBO apply to gag Mr Dobbie so the criminals are free for another 11 years !!
C. Witnesses - next page (or below).
Witnesses - to some of the crimes and abuses being covered up by |
|||
Ref |
Crime/event |
Witness |
Criminals |
C1 |
Rape |
A.D. Maya. |
T. S. |
C2 |
Rape reported |
A.D. Maya, North Wales Police, Cheshire Police, CWAC legals, |
T.S. |
C3 |
Rape cover up |
A.D. Cheshire Police, CWAC – all, CPS |
Cheshire Police, CWAC – all, CPS, |
|
Child sexual abuses |
A.D. Primary witness. |
K.R. CAD. |
C4 |
Child abuses |
A.D. O.D. G.D. T.D. L.B. |
CAD, KR |
C5 |
Witnesses to the detailed evidence of the rape and child abuses |
Tom Dobbie |
Cheshire Police, CWAC – all, CPS, CAD, KR, |
C6 |
Crimes wilfully covered up |
Evidence by Tom Dobbie traceable emails and attachments. |
John Dwyer, Nigel Parr |
C7 |
CPS lying to magistrates |
Tom Dobbie, Karen Challinor. Done to falsely imprison Tom Dobbie. Done to torture Tom Dobbie. |
CPS would not disclose person and blocked all communications |
C8 |
Defendant excluded from court discussions |
Tom Dobbie, Karen Challinor. Discussions in court were different from what Tom Dobbie was saying |
Defence barrister |
C9 |
Electricity and water turned off in flat by police |
Tom Dobbie, neighbours |
Cheshire Police |
C10 |
Flat burgled |
Tom Dobbie, Karen Challinor, Crime number 329 4/3/2017 |
Cheshire Police |
C11 |
Tortured |
Tom Dobbie, 7 NHS Psychiatrists. |
Cheshire Police, CPS. |
d. Legal waiver agreed to ALL materials and evidence.
(
Unlike CPS who hide everything, allow the abusers to isolate and gag and control the children, dump the defendant unlawfully in a dungeon to gag him, and seek approval of the court to join their criminal conspiracy).
THUS -
Not only are the requirements of
CPR 38 met, but the extraordinary level of criminality in abuse of process and abuse of power by CPS and police demands that the indictments are quashed and a judicail review and judicial finding of facts undertaken. The CHILDREN MUST BE RESCUED FROM THEIR ABUSERS WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT.
Tom Dobbie . End of document.
PageBelow Used as instructions between posting and circulation
Dear Clerk to The Court, I hope you are well – My Children and I Are Not.
1. Please copy all 3 pages to Judges Dutton. Woodward, Thompson
and to the Criminals Running CPS.
2. This Does Not Replace Parts 1, 2, 3, But Is Typed To Clarify Some Main Points; Especially The Witnesses Who Cheshire Police And CPS Say Either Do Not Exist, or Have No Evidence (Reported In Unaudited Reports Of No Substance By Cheshire Police and CPS).
3. I Look Forward To Presenting All Of The Evidence Necessary To Fulfil The Application I Have Made To The Crown Court, As Well As Cross Examining The Criminals In CPS Who Say No Evidence Exists.
4. * Below Is ReWritten In This Typed Version For Clarification.*
Matters applied for and so far ignored by the courts.
I Have Already Made Applications For:-
The Indictments To Be Quashed.
The Defendant Released.
The Real Criminals To Be Charged.
A Judicial Review And Judicial Finding Of Facts.
Tom Dobbie