2018 Crown Court application 2v2

To, the clerk to the court, Chester Crown Court.
1. Please copy this to the Judge and the CPS in the case of Regina V Tom Dobbie listed for 9th May 2018.
2. I am a litigant in person, and no documents whatsoever have been sent to or seen by the defendant. Cheshire Police and CPS ensured the defendant was isolated and gagged on remand in order to have yet another unlawful trial in Chester that keeps children in abuse.
3. Can you please ensure with Altcourse prison that the defendant appears in court on the day. Video link is wholly inadequate.

Case Management

1. I am applying for the charges to be quashed based on multiple irregularities: -
1.1. I am reporting crimes. Many of these crimes have been enabled, caused, propagated and carried out by Cheshire police and Chester CPS.
1.2. These matters are of necessity being reported to the Attorney General, the Home Secretary, the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice, the Director of CPS due to the interference of Cheshire Police and Chester CPS to stop these crimes being reported and dealt with lawfully.
1.3. The second arrest of Tom Dobbie in April 2018 by Cheshire police. Was because Tom Dobbie was communicating more details to the Attorney General showing the interference to the course of justice by Cheshire police and CPS. So, Cheshire Police acted to yet again to stop the exposure of their crimes.
1.4. In both arrests and interrogations (these were interrogations more than interviews. Listen to the interview, the police woman was very nasty in her behaviour and attitude to the defendant) , the wrong CBO document was used in the arrest and interrogation.
1.5. In both arrests and interrogations, there was blatant non disclosure of the evidence of child abuses that was evidenced in the emails.
1.6. In both arrests and interrogations, the witness evidence by Graham Dean was not disclosed. He is a witness who Cheshire Police previously deemed his evidence so serious, that they interviewed him on video. Currently there are complaints against Cheshire Police as to why the interview and video evidence by Graham Dean has been covered up and vanished.
1.7. Cheshire police burgled Tom Dobbie's flat and stole computers. There are two crime numbers for this burglary. Cheshire police have been investigating themselves in this burglary for over a year.
1.8. Cheshire police are in contempt of court from the Crown Court case in 2017. They were ordered by the judge to return computers to assist Tom Dobbie remove some web content. The computer equipment stolen by Cheshire police has still not been returned.
1.9. See diagram 'Non Disclosures History 1' for a summary overview of unlawful non disclosures.

Case

2. Reasonable cause to communicate with the Attorney General based on:-
2.1. all of the reasons stated above in 1 through 1.8.
2.2. The high level of repeatability of Cheshire Police and CPS to cover up these crimes indicates that these are wilful acts and malicious.
2.3. The initial crimes that were covered up by police and CPS include - child rape, child sexual abuses, child battering, assaults, harassment, theft, destruction of property.
2.4. Subsequent to the crimes in 2.3 above, the police and CPS entered into spiralling crimes in order to cover up more....

Witnesses

W1. Aurora Dobbie - Rape, sexual abuses, batterings, child cruelty.
W2. Graham Dean - criminal child assaults and child cruelty
W3. Debra Dean-Chadwick - police cover up of crimes.
W4. Interviewing police woman in first arrest in April 2018 - non disclosures.
W5. Interviewing police woman in second arrest in April 2018 - non disclosures.
W6. CPS decision maker in first charge in April 2018 - non disclosures.
W7. CPS decision maker in second charge in April 2018 - non disclosures.
W8. Attorney General - non disclosures responses. (this is needed as the second policewoman said very nastily and sarcastically to Tom Dobbie - "think you've ever had a reply from the Attorney General?"
W9. A representative from iiCSA (head - Professor Jay). Child sexual abuses and their cover up reported to iiCSA. This case is lodged with iiCSA in detailed evidence showing the mechanisms employed to cover up the crimes against my children by Cheshire authorities).
W10. Judge Woodward – the unlawful granting of an injunction IMMEDIATELY after acquittal.
W11. Judge Dutton – Judge Dutton – the unlawful finding of Tom Dobbie as guilty, in a trial with no evidence, no jury, and a 5 month case management where not only was there total non-disclosures, but no defence evidence whatsoever (even though there was copious evidence showing the defendant as not guilty on all accounts). This lead to Judge Berkson granting an unlawful CBO from Cheshire Police designed to stop the exposure and reporting of crimes. Cheshire Police subsequently arrested Tom Dobbie for reporting crimes.
W12. Judge Pearce – before recusing himself, stating that (evidenced by professionals reporting) a penis forced into a child's mouth was not a crime.
W13. Judge Barnett – stating that lengthy and repeated child battering leaving marks was acceptable to the family court.
W14. Tom Dobbie – the covering up of extensive crimes by Cheshire Police, Chester CPS and Chester Judiciary. Many more witnesses are available who can testify to the many crimes across this lengthy case.

Application for Bail

On the basis that the charges are not quashed, then bail is necessary to:-
1. To stop criminality.
2. To stop abuse of process.
3. To stop non disclosures of evidence.

Non Disclosures History 1 Non-Disclosure as defined by A.G. guidelines on disclosure 28th June 2017. The evidence of ND is present in multiple court documents, and can be identified clearly in Part 39 – Records of actions and decisions.
Date	Event	(ND)Non Disclosures By
Feb 2006	CAD lied and manipulated CP (Cheshire Police) to assist her in the crime of abducting a child who was protected from removal by a Prohibited Steps order with power of arrest for anyone attempting or carrying out the abduction.	ND of CP (Cheshire Police) assisting in crime. ND of CP assaulting Tom Dobbie.
March 2006	TWD gets full custody of daughter. CAD leaves.
CAD returns pregnant. TWD takes extensive actions to assist her fitting back into the family, but situation gets more and more volatile and abusive from CAD to children and dad.
Nov 2009 Social services report CAD as violent and abusive against her children. Dad made primary carer to protect the children. However, CAD gets more volatile, abusive and violent to the children and dad.
July 2010	CAD lied and manipulated CP to assist her covering up her crimes, and falsely accuse the victim (TWD) – after she yet again assaulted her toddler son and her husband (TWD).	No investigation by CP. ND by CP. ND by CPS
July 2010 Cheshire police refuse to investigate lengthy list of crimes carried out by CAD. Blatant refusal to follow investigation rules.
Jan 2011	Victim (TWD) found guilty of over reacting in defence of toddler and himself from substantial assaults by CAD.	ND by CP. ND by CPS
May 2011	Victim (TWD) cleared in Crown Court on appeal from above miscarriage of justice.	ND by CP ND by CPS.
May 2011	Full re submission of crimes and evidence to Cheshire police – including evidence from Crown Court. CP refuse to investigate lengthy list of crimes carried out by CAD. Blatant refusal by CP to follow investigation rules.
May 2011	With TWD being prevented from protecting his daughter, she is raped and assaulted more. Daughter refuses to return to mum’s house. CAFCASS report abuses of the children by mum and her new partner. Dad has 100% custody and CAD recommended to have psychiatric help because of her extreme abuse (spitting in daughter’s mouth etc.).
Nov 2011. Cheshire West cover up the rape, sexual assaults and abuses of the children. Cheshire police also cover up. One of the many official documents showing this cover up is the 2011 CIN meeting report. Cheshire West having originally reported mum as violent and abusive, then cover it all up after the police negligence in July 2010, and now carry out extensive applications to the court until a family court judge covers up the rape, sexual abuses, violence and psychological abuses. Munby said judges and professionals can be criticised as long as children’s names are not exposed – so, dad exposes the cover up of the children’s abuses by family court, social services and police. What subsequently follows is ongoing abuse of power, abuse of process, unlawfulness and criminality by police, cps, and judiciary to cover up.
2014 Feb	Charged and remanded with stalking and harassment of the child abusers by Cheshire police.	ND by police. ND by CPS.
2015 April	Acquitted in Crown Court.	ND by police and ND by CPS
2015 April	Injunction unlawfully applied for immediately on acquittal by CPS and unlawfully approved immediately by Judge Woodward. CPS never investigated all the crimes they had just heard in the trial evidence, but instead, applied for the injunction to bury the evidence of their negligence.	ND by CPS Cover up by CPS.
2016	TWD arrested and charged by CP.	ND by CP. ND by CPS.
2017	Unlawful trial with no evidence, no jury, no witnesses	ND by CP. ND by CPS.
2017	Unlawful granting of CBO (abuse of process, abuse of power, perverting the course of justice).	ND by CP. ND by CPS.
2018	TWD arrested and charged for reporting the ND’s and unlawfulness by Cheshire Police and CPS to the Attorney General.	ND by CP. ND by CPS.
There are more than 20 SETS of Non-Disclosure by  CP/CPS/Judiciary. If we assume conservatively that each set of non-disclosures has 10 significant items, this gives 200 significant non-disclosures. With this large number of non-disclosures, then these acts by police and cps are criminal.

End of page ' 2018 Crown Court application '.