2018 Questions page

2018 Questions

This is an area that will keep being updated as relevant questions are asked or come to mind. Especially important for clarifying any misunderstandings or ambiguity.

Is there abuse of process and/or abuse of power here ?

When you collect all of the information about this case and it's 8 year history, there is a staggering amount of abuse of power, abuse of process, unlawfulness and crimes (simple overview - [q001] see NonDisclosures). It started off with prejudice against men by Cheshire police, and escalated into more and more criminality in order to cover up. This is a biblical 'Mexican Standoff' as the self protecting system of authority batters Tom Dobbie to cover up the crimes against them that he is reporting.

Is Tom Dobbie in contempt of court ?

Exactly the opposite. Tom Dobbie is exposing that the power of police, courts, council are all being used for criminal purposes. The police, judiciary and social services are all highly evidenced as acting like a private fiefdom for corrupt people carrying out crimes.
Much of the criminality arises from people reacting to what is essentially whistleblowing. Modern government employees are experts at destroying people who expose corruption in the system.
CLARIFICATION. It is not the system that is corrupt, it is the corrupt people inside the system. No amount of rules or regulations will stop vile selfish people who are abusing power.

Is Tom Dobbie actually being tortured ?

Yes. You cannot get to being distressed and anxious at battle fatigue level because you are being treated nicely.
The abuses creating this level of anxiety and distress are recorded. They fit the CPS, the UN and many other descriptions as to what constitutes torture.
THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT IS SUPPORTING ACTS OF TORTURE BY ITS EMPLOYEES.
Theresa May was informed of this and shrugged her shoulders.
As did Alison Saunders, Amber Rudd, Justin Madders and many others.

Why do you think Rotherham, Wrexham, Rochdale and all the other multiple abuses and multiple crimes took place ? - because people were tortured and abused not to speak out.

Is what is happening to Tom Dobbie's children a rare event ?

No, ultra sadly, the numbers of children put into abuse by the authorities runs into hundreds of thousands. These courts, police, social workers behave very nasty and criminally to lots of children, parents, grandparents.
With so many afflicted, the analysis states clearly that it would be better to do away with family courts and social services.
"What about Baby P events" people usually cry out. Baby P had lots of social workers and police and and and and and - and they ALL failed.
'Lessons learned' is the great excuse again and again and again - and they just keep happening.
The system creates more abuse than it solves, and it batters anyone reporting the failures. Tom Dobbie had imprisonment documents served on him for exposing social services using poetry as the medium. No laws were broken, no children's names, just a vicious nasty act by Cheshire West and Chester Council to help gag Dobbie from exposing their CRIMINAL failings.

Can Cheshire police prove they have investigated properly here ?

Neither Cheshire Police, PPS, PPU, safeguarding, CPS can demonstrate they have an audit trail showing that they are truthful, moral, or even followed policy or procedure.
In simple terms, they shoot from the hip, make things up as they go along, and abuse power to criminally assault and abuse anyone exposing their criminality.
Not a single senior officer from those selected for witnesses can demonstrate a proper working auditable system that stops them covering up their own crimes.

One of their nasty games is getting things wrong at the start, and then pretending that result is correct, so everything downstream of the error or crime is considered valid. It is how con men and gangsters work.

Is there a trick Cheshire police use to stop evidence ?

Yes. A number, but the main one is - always arrest the VICTIM !
.
Now, if you arrest the real victim V1, then the courts disallow the evidence that shows the the supposed victim V2 is in any way guilty.
Neat ! You only select evidence to make the real victim V1 look guilty.

Is there prejudice against men by Cheshire police ?

Yes. In domestic violence, Cheshire police almost always arrest the man. Then, no matter how nasty, vile, violent the woman is, all the evidence gets hidden - voila guilty man !
In domestic violence cases the cps managed to get the government to let them disallow virtually all of the man's evidence. By doing so, they would get more convictions - even if they were putting the real victim in prison.

Are the statistics on male/female violence wrong ?

Yes. Since police target men, then you get many more male convictions than female convictions - voila, a femminist dream to prove men are always the bad ones.
However, in detailed domestic violence government figures in UK and USA show it's almost 50/50 male and female perpetrators - so, how come all the men arrested, charged, imprisoned ? (femminists in powerful places ?)
Worse, in matters of child abuse, the main perpetrators are women (NSPCC, CDC, US Gov reporting, UK Gov reporting) , but [q002] adverts and [q003] police campaigns always promate hatred of men.

How about all the repeat offenders ?

Arrest a man because his wife is assaulting the chidren and her husband (yes, that's my case and well evidenced), don't do a real investigation (still my case), charge the man (still my case), get him convicted with one sided evidence (my case), put him (the victim) in prison, put his children into abuse (my case), and give the woman an injunction to enable her to beat up the kids without interference (in my case Cheshire police also helped her destroy my company business, destroy my finances and steal the house).
THEN,
when the man sends a birthday card to his children, he gets convicted of breaking the injunction( In my case they put me on remand for six months and lost the case in Chester Crown court. The CPS and police ignored all [q004] the evidence of her violence and abuses, and immediately after they lost the case, they put an injunction on me to try and stop it getting out they had victimised the victims).

I have met lots of these victimised victim men. It happens to women, but much less frequently.
So next time you hear about reoffending, think of the kids dad getting imprisoned for the birthday card - all while the crime commissioner and chief constable smile while they say they are hard on crime and reoffending; they just got big salary payments from your tax money to abuse children and parents.
That's why they have arrested Tom Dobbie so many times - because he is exposing their criminality with evidence.

Do Cheshire police need Sherlock Holmes ?

I need to be abrupt, or I will suffer another fit. What is evidenced here is that the public are being conned on an enormous level. Having accidently read the Crown Court Evidence 16/05/2018 supplied by the prosecution, again, it is difficult to comprehend that it has not been put together by primary school children. There is no significant level of intellectual input or ability. The greatest sense of analytical capability is by people stating they can track Tom Dobbie's email and phones - after the emails have already been sent to them; yes, primary school kids can do this easily.
Now, do these people have a reasonable understanding of human behaviour, especially with respect to how people with power over others behave ? If you are not going to be simply running a gang of thugs, then it is important to have an understanding how these peculiarly power laden collectives of people actually behave.
Can we be informed about such behaviour without always watching a posteriori ? Well, yes we can. There is all of history, as long as we recognise history is written by the victors, and take precautions to understand the validity of the data. Easier, is the study under controlled conditions of human psychology. We have some well accepted understanding of the individual and the collective through such endevours. Essential classic experiments in psychology which portray the behaviour of groups having power over others can be found - [q005] Zimbardo ([q006] live , [q007] video, [q008] videolive ), [q009] Millgram ([q010] live) ,[q011] Ash ([q012] live). [q013] Peterson ([q014] excellent graduate level lectures in psychology)
When you look at modern scandals, Wrexham, Rotherham, Rochdale etc then these behaviours reported by the psycholgy experiments are obtusely evident. Now, are Cheshire Police, CPS and Chester Judiciary informed in these deep level behaviours of people and collectives ? or do they just run on prejudice, or worse, gangster style self serving. In the extensive evidence collected by Dobbie over ten years, there is abject and criminal failure by Cheshire Police, Chester CPS and very sadly, Chester Judiciary (especially Barnett, Pearce, Dutton ).
It would be wrong not to bring this up. Nobody should defend a system with over paid people that can, and does, destroy people's lives, while it floats on a mess mostly made of trite drivel. Why should people get paid to destroy lives and carry out dreadful miscarriages of justice ?
We really need to have all of this case televised to let the public know how bad these people are, and show how viciously destructive these abusers in the system can be when getting away with it.
I am despondant that my children's abuses, and almost certainly many others, are continued for years by such a justice system as evidenced here over 10 years.

 

End of page ' 2018 Questions '.