Use the links above to see the specific issues.

Page content is on the right hand side.

Click on the picture to get back to the home page.

Last updated for corrections on 27th Nov 2018.

......

Dobbie 2018/19 Case blog

Blog summary.

The core skeleton argument is [ 2018 Magistrates] on the left menu.

The left hand menu items [ Betrayed by judges] [ The hiding] [ Case blog]

[ Crimes] [ Witnesses] [ Documents]

[ Non Disclosures] [ Questions] [ Control] [ Byrne] [ HR Breaches] [ Harassment] [ Poems] are all hyperlinked to documents constituting the broader argument,and all of this fits within CPR, CPS , audit ability and legibility requirements. This case involves the CPS and judiciary assisting criminality by Cheshire Police on a large scale of serious crimes. The more you investigate the truth here, the more criminality by agents of the state you will find. These criminals are so arrogant about their power to carry out crimes,that they get corrupt judges to approve orders to gag people from reporting crimes. This trial is about the police, CPS and judiciary gagging Tom Dobbie from - - his obligations to his children, - his obligations to society, - his obligations to the Crown - his reporting of crimes. The evidence by the defendant is extensive, as are the witnesses. The CPS and judiciary want no evidence and no witnesses - just like they did in 2017 in a very unlawful and corrupt trial (if you care to examine the evidence).

This page is administration matters and case blog..

27th Nov. Dear Clerk to the Court and CPS (Chester Crown Court), please pass this on to the judge and CPS in the case of Regina v Tom Dobbie.

1. The judge kindly said that I could keep him and CPS informed of any changes, developments by Email. I have been psychologically poorly and only now am forcing myself to give feedback and updates as part of my submissions. I cannot convey with words how vile all of this abuse and torture on my children and me is - but I've given a short summary of some words in a new section called 'victims' .

2. I have started expanding the witnesses by linking each witness to an N20 form.

3. I am submitting an additional form for altering the original injunction after acquital to be fully removed, as it was created by an unlawful procedure.

4. The matter of the theft of my property by fraud on the court by CAD, assisted by Cheshire Police and CWAC has taken a higher priority. The CSA is chasing me for money that was fraudulantly claimed by CAD, who never told the CSA that she was living in a house paid for by me, and additionally being funded with free heating and water heating paid for by me. The CSA knew I had no longer any funds, and they put a charge of £4k on my house. Subsequently, CAD made a fraudulant application in a fraudulant ex parte hearing to have the equity of the house assigned solely to her (having never paid 1pence to the house payments). Cheshire West document used to perjure the family court was used to defraud the county court. Cheshire police assisted CAD by chasing Tom Dobbie all over the place in multiple arrests and incarcerations and keeping Tom Dobbie from reporting crimes. When all of this was reported to Cheshire police, they told Tom Dobbie that Cheshire police do not deal with fraud or theft.
I ask the court to consider an application forcing Cheshire police to investigate the fraud and theft and harassment and torture and cover up of crimes.

5. If only God could show the whole world the reality of the evil stomping through Chester; but Cheshire police and their powerful friends are determined the truth shall not be reported, and that the crimes should remain festering on forever, and that the overiding objective of justice will be bludgeoned to death in the continuing mob frenzy.

6. How many times will we see Wrexham, Rochdale, Rotherham, Haringay, Nottinham, Hillsborough etc ( and even the same evil pattern of abuse of process across the globe) ? Maybe it is only going to be a posteriori that the truth will be known, exactly as it has all through history (Gulags, Concentration Camps.....). So, I wait and hope and pray for my children.

.................................................................................................................................

8th Nov. Dear Clerk to the Court and CPS (Chester Crown Court), please pass this on to the judge and CPS in the case of Regina v Tom Dobbie.

1. There are two very special police who I need to call as witnesses (over and above those already stated ) .

1.1. D.C. Humpage

1.2. Gary Smith T/Detective Chief Inspector.

1.3. These two between them are evidenced as covering up the child abuses that are collectively reported by

1.3.1. Aurora Dobbie

1.3.2. Aurora's own mum

1.3.1. mum's own Email stating her violence and abuses

1.3.2. mum's own acceptance of CH (social services reporting mum's violence and abuses),

1.3.3. mum's own acceptance of CAFCASS reporting her violence and abuses

1.4. Graham Dean's video evidence taken by police

1.5. Available neighbours as witnesses

1.6. Dad's reporting.

2. These two between them avoided and ignored a large amount of evidence, ignored witnesses, bizarrely come to the conclusion that Graham's reporting of crime had not been reported and recorded correctly by Cheshire police

3. These two say they don't believe there were any abuses because they asked the criminal mum, who said she never did any of these.

4. This little exercise shows that either Cheshire police are up to their necks in lying, or, they are idiots who cannot possibly justify being employed.
4.1. Either way, it shows criminality in covering up a multiplicity of crimes.

5. All of the documents showing what is stated above are available already, but can be re submitted if you cannot find them.

..................................................................................................................................

7th Nov. Dear Clerk to the court, Chester Crown court, please pass this on to the judge in the case of Regina v Tom Dobbie - trial management hearing on Friday 9th Nov.

1. The judge suggested in the previous hearing that the case was probably not in the public interest, and that the CPS should consider if or not to pursue the case, or lay it on file.

2. I fully oppose the dropping of the case, unless a judicial review is agreed by the judge into how such a mountain of criminality by Cheshire Police, CWAC, CPS and judges in Chester County, Chester Magistrates and Chester Crown Court, has managed to run through approximately 8 years of around -

2.1. 117 court appearances ,

2.2. 16 arrests into overnight custody,

2.3. 5 times remanded totalling two years,

2.4. one sectioning - in order to have psychiatrists verify what the defendant was reporting was real, witnessed, evidenced.,

2.5. the rape, sexual abuses and battering of children ( and other child abuses)

2.6. the destruction of the defendants life ( Human rights breaches as stated in the defendant's application to the court)

2.7. the destruction of all personal finances of the defendant - including the organised theft of his home

2.8. the destruction of the defendants businesses ( estimated net worth of damages at approximately £1.6 million pounds some 4 years ago)

2.9. the harassment of the defendant by cheshire police

2.10 the theft of property Cheshire police burgled from the defendants flat, while they had lied to have him remanded out of the way.

2.11. in all, the acts of criminality by the executive will be found to add up exceeding 100 crimes.

2.12. and all of these crimes and their covering up by Cheshire police, CPS, CWAC, judiciary give over 100 reasonable causes

for the defendant writing his emails reporting crimes by Cheshire police to higher authorities.

3. To say this is not in the public interest would simply be an act of complicity in the crimes carried out against the defendant and his children.

4. If CPS wish to continue their complicity to crimes and the covering up of evidence,rather than admit them,then all of the witnesses and evidence showing -

4.1. explicit,

4.2. implicit,

4.3. individually and

4.4. jointly

that there is reasonable cause must go ahead in the Crown Court trial allowing for the scrutiny of the public in what is already a course of conduct of gross misconduct by the executive.

4.5. The public interest must see clearly why the executive has spent probably around £2 million pounds of public funds to propagate and cover up child rape, child sexual abuses and a host of other serious and vile crimes.

5. Note: Robert Pickthall above, has been included because he is a witness on the criminality by CWAC stealing funds from the public purse, and then viciously setting about those (Dobbie et al ) reporting CWAC's criminality - in particular, judge Dutton's mistress Vanessa Whiting.

5.1. The list of witnesses already put forward by the defendant is a brief list, there are many more public and professionals as witnesses to possibly call on.

5.2. The list of evidence (including documents hyperlinked in the defendants application, and supplied on the DVD rom to CPS and judge) is only a brief list of the evidence showing extensive criminality by the executive. A full list can be easily made from the multiple cloud sites, or on a portable hard drive ( as was supplied previously to the last trial in the Crown Court where ALL of the evidence was ignored from trial management onwards in an act of criminality across police, solicitor, barrister, CPS, judges).

...............................................................................................................................

7th Nov

Dear recipients,

Please ensure these get forwarded to The Attorney General and to Alison Saunders DPP.

Dear Clerk to the court, Chester Crown court, please pass this on to the judge in the case of Regina v Tom Dobbie - trial management hearing on Friday 9th Nov.

1. The courts in Chester are up to their necks in contempt of court, both wilful, and criminally negligent.
1.1. It is under the Attorney General's direct obligation to stop it.
1.2. It is his department's responsibility to bring to account those who are abusing power to gain favour to their cronies in these Chester courts.
1.3. I am requesting the Attorney General as a witness in the case Regina v Tom Dobbie, where he will testify about unlawful and criminal acts by the executive.

2. Alison Saunders correctly stated that things carried out by CPS were her responsibility.
2.1. On her watch, her cps were involved directly in putting a child into harms way, and consequently raped, then sexually abused.
2.2. On her watch, her cps were heavily involved in repeated wilful acts of covering up evidence to prevent the children being protected.
2.3. Alison Saunders, a self professed feminist has allowed her team to enable, propagate, and then cover up child sexual abuses and other crimes.
2.4. I am requesting Alison Saunders as a witness in the case Regina v Tom Dobbie, where she will testify about unlawful and criminal acts by the executive.

Details of the case for your preparation can be downloaded from -
- http://www.moralpropositions.com/downloads/a6570dd/TomDobbie/twenty18/Twenty18Home.html

....................................................................................................................

29th Oct 2018. My little boys birthday was over a week ago, and because of the criminality of police, cps, judiciary, I have no idea if he is alive or well. All while these vile police, cps and judges sit on their rancid sphincters self congratulating that they have gotten away with child abuse and torture amongst many other crimes.
Email to Chester Crown Court requesting clarification about explicit/implicit , and an important witness.
Dear Clerk to the court, Chester Crown Court , (29th Oct)
please pass this on to the judge and CPS in this case
( next case management hearing is on 9th Nov )

1. How is it possible that gross non disclosure has been allowed in this case and the magistrates case, and the previous Crown Court case ( the one where Dutton acknowledged from the solicitors and Barrister that not one piece of the extensive evidence submitted by the defendant had been looked at all the way through from charges being brought, through case management, through the bizarre trial with no evidence, no jury , and the defendant told he was guilty even though he never made an unequivocal plea ) ?
1.1. The latest issue of CPS of the Code for Crown Prosecutors states clearly -

Under the revised guidelines on disclosure, prosecutors must consider whether there is any material held by the police or material that may be available which could affect the decision to charge a suspect with any crime.

It is quite clearly evidenced that this has not been done in this current case, or the previous cases.

1.2. This means that ALL of my evidence must be heard, and ALL of my witnesses must be produced.

2. The case cannot be dropped or put on file as it evidences the gross criminal abuse of process by the executive.
2.1. Putting the case on file leaves the innocence of the defendant unanswered, and this is not tenable.

3. There is a raging debate across a lot of professors, doctors and graduates about this case. Some are concerned that my submission has too much that is implicit, rather than explicit. They feel this is easily misconstrued or dismissed by disingenuous arguments by the executive.
3.1. My own position is that the Overriding Objective must necessarily prevent the abuse of implicit evidence. If this is not the case in law, then please advise me, and I will re write every single thing out as explicit.

4. A witness missed out is the MP Justin Madders. He was presented with documents showing my daughter had been raped, sexually abused, and the children violently abused - and, that CWAC had covered it up.
4.1. He wrote to CWAC, and Gerald Meehan replied to him stating everything had been investigated. This reply was even though I had shown Justin Madders a letter from CWAC saying they had not, and were not investigating these matters.
4.2. Cheshire police colluded with CWAC in the cover up of the crimes, and the subsequent criminal acts against the children and Dobbie.
4.3. Justin Madders refused to take the matter further because his wife is a senior executive in CWAC.
4.4. The documents shown to Justin Madders , and his reply from Meehan are all in the overall evidence bundle and an email audit trail exists.
4.5. So, I will be calling Justin Madders as a witness .

5. Note to iiCSA.
This is a case for the iiCSA that has extensive auditable evidence right from the start. The evidence and the audit trails show clearly the multiple tactics and strategies by criminals in the executive to cover up child sexual abuses.

regards, Tom Dobbie
...........................................................................

28th Sep 2018. Attended Crown Court today with a friend - you ALWAYS need witnesses, because these Chester judges, barristers, CPS and police cannot be trusted.

The above statement is based on recorded and evidenced acts by these corrupt authorities - 1. Evidence of multiple acts of corruption in 119 court appearances in Chester,
2. 16 unlawful arrests into overnight custody,5 times unlawfully incarcerated on remand adding up to over 2 years,
3. 5 weeks sectioned to prove I was telling the truth,
4. 322 days on tag preventing contact with family and friends,
5. ~ 1,000 days of forced isolation,
6. ~ 2,000 days of torture, of which
7. over ~900 forced close to suicide,
8. multiple acts of criminality by Cheshire police, including cover up of their crimes,too many acts of wilful non disclosure by police and cps to count, victims of crimes Cheshire police are desperate to criminally cover up, and many witnesses who report the same crimes I am reporting,and, I have top NHS psychiatrists written reports stating that
12.1. I am not deluded, and
12.2. I am reporting evidenced truths.

In simple speaking, evil, criminal people pervade and control the executive branch
of the state in Cheshire and Chester.
I was surprised there was yet again a different judge, saving the last one from publicly recusing himself. The new judge seems a nice chap at face value, but you have to take into consideration that my mind thinks a bit slow nowadays because of all the torture, abuses, harassment and subsequent medications that I am subjected to.
This judge wants new applications from me and CPS by the 12th Oct. I must take mine on paper to the Crown Court and pick up a paper copy of the CPS prosecution case. This judge then went on at length as to if or not the CPS prosecution was in the public interest. He described how my 'crime' constituted something not terribly serious at face value, and if I was found guilty, that any sentence would likely be rather lenient based on how little I had actually done ( because I reported crimes by Cheshire police, and it was Cheshire police who got their cronies in CPS and Chester judiciary to make it a crime for me to report crimes. The fact that this gagging is not just unlawful, but is being used criminally by the police to cover up child rape, child sexual abuses, child battering and a myriad of associated and consequential crimes, seems of little relevance to all the crooked judges , CPS and police in Chester and Cheshire).

It seems to escape these judges that they have a job described in statute that says they cannot wallow in criminality, nor can they reinterpret the law completely different from how it is stated and historically interpreted. Judges Barnett, Pearce, Dutton, Berkson and many others are trashing the law in plain sight and relying on public stupidity to allow them to do this.

So, this new judge seems to have already joined the evil judges in Chester. He is ignoring the serious evidenced crimes in front of him. He is effectively assisting in covering these serious crimes. He is assisting in keeping abused children and a tortured father in criminal perpetuity. This is more of the breaking of the overriding objective of justice as well as breaking the statute behind judicial conduct.

When reality has occured, and the recorded tested evidence of that reality is wholly sufficient, then why do these judges in Chester Courts believe they can repeatedly create a fictitious version of reality ? Is it a mark of stupidity, or criminal stubborness ? Whatever it is, it shows contempt of court, contempt for the justice system, contempt for decency, contempt for public morals. The Attorney General, Lord Chief Justice, Lord Chancelor, Director of CPS, Home secretary are all in on this, they have been informed, they choose criminally to wilful ignorance.

So, it leaves the tortured Tom Dobbie to speak up for justice, moral decency, truth; onwards with yet another retyping of the defendants case and evidence; an act that is mental punishment and torture yet again.

...............................................................................................................

27th Sep 2018. I discovered at teatime from a friend contacting me that I am in Chester Crown Court tomorrow. Over three weeks ago they had emailed me saying that the date of the next appearance in court was not fixed, but they would contact me. They never informed me. This happens lots. The authority of the court rests with the chaos of its maladministration - which is contempt of court.

26th Sep 2018. Dear Clerk to the Court, Chester Crown Court, please pass this on to CPS and (yet to be recused) judge.

1. Further to my previous emails regarding this scandal.

2. I have had over over 114 appearances in Chester Courts, arrested into overnight custody 16 times, remanded into HMP Altcourse 5 times totalling 2 years, put on electronic tag for 322 days ---- injunctions against me reporting crimes, CBO against me reporting crimes.

3. For what ? ....because I reported crimes ......

4. Crimes against who ? ......crimes primarily and originating against my children and me
.......subsequently crimes against the Crown by executives within the justice system.

5. What kind of crimes ? ........Child rape, child sexual abuses, child physical assaults, child emotional abuses, theft, fraud, harassment, torture, abuse of power, misconduct in public office, contempt of court and more.

6. Why are police covering it up ? ....because they were extremely negligent at the start in 2010, .......and it spiralled into more and more criminality ............as they did everything to cover it all up.

7. Why have judiciary not sorted it out ? .....because these judges in Chester are hard evidenced as acting criminally ........ to assist police, CPS, barristers all carrying out crimes..

8. Why have higher authorities not sorted it out ? ......already, Theresa May as Home secretary said it was a matter for police ........ and she replied abdicating all responsibility. .........already, the Attorney General and Amber Rudd also abdicated responsibility

9. What am I (defendant Tom Dobbie) trying to achieve ? 9.1. The rescue of my children who are forced to be with abusers. 9.2. The exposure of a corrupt system using vast amounts of taxpayers money ......to run a literal gangsterland.

10. More than sufficient evidence of crimes ....is being continually and wilfully ignored ........by the police, CPS and Courts in Chester.

11. I am currently on charge for reporting crimes ......crimes by Cheshire Police ........reporting them to the Attorney General ! and ....... the police in Cheshire ...........have made it a crime to report crimes by Cheshire police.

12. Who let Cheshire police do this ? ......it is their cronies in Chester CPS and judiciary.

13. The trial for these charges was refused to be processed .........after being declared Ultra Vires ............by the judge in Chester Magistrates on 11th May 2018.

14. Identical charges are still now running towards a full jury trial ....... in Chester Crown Court in January 2019.

15. The judge in the Crown Court is already evidenced as - ......... - acting unlawfully, criminally, and ........... openly acting as a prejudiced advocate against the defendant. ....... and he MUST recuse himself.

16. This judge must now be a witness in this trial ....which evidences the necessity of reporting crimes by Cheshire police ...... to the Attorney General, Lord Chief Justice, Lord Chancellor, Home Secretary.

17. One Chester judge has already recused himself over all this.

18. This is a SUPERSCANDAL ....against the judiciary ......created by the collective judiciary in Chester.

19. This is a SUPERSCANDAL ..... against the government.

20. I am a consultant physicist with global business experience, .....and a lot of friends across the globe backing up all of my evidence.

21. Eventually the truth (highly evidenced and with witnesses) .........will get out fully.

22. See the links in the forwarded file.

and just in case - http://www.moralpropositions.com/downloads/a6570dd/TomDobbie/twenty18/Twenty18Home.html

.............................................................................................

23rd Sep 2018. Yet another Email (immediately below) to Chester Crown Court and to the people at the top of the executive chain who are responsible for the justice system, and it's current lack of moral decency and extensive criminality in Chester.................

Tom Dobbie <anima.tom.dobbie@gmail.com> 21:28 (2 hours ago)
to chester.crowncourt, Ian.Dobbie, Contact@iiCSA.
Dear Clerk to the court, Chester Crown Court,
Please pass this on to the judge and CPS in the case already declared ULTRA VIRES
by a previous judge. (this has also been submitted to Ministry of Justice for forwarding to the Attorney General, The Lord Chief Justice, The Lord Chancellor and Secretary ).
1. Yet another week of the criminality and and abuses of my children and I has been allowed to pass.
1.1. Judges, CPS, and other executives of the state are involved,
1.2. and contrary to their job descriptions,
1.3. contrary to statute,
1.4. contrary to lawfulness
1.5. contrary to moral decency,
they have allowed these extensive crimes to be covered up and some kept running.

2. The facts in all of this are written, recorded, planted all over the place in duplicates.
2.1. Current and future auditors and students can and will read these facts.
2.2. Since these executives of the state are holding on to some kind of 'Mexican Standoff' , they are wilfully promoting these crimes

3. The judges and CPS must resign and submit themselves to police for arrest and charging.
3.1. That's what real judges who are honourable would do.
3.2. That's what real judges who would not bring the judiciary into gross disrepute would do.
3.3. Only fake judges would plough on trying to keep covering up and propagating these crimes.

4. How far up the ladder of authority does this criminality run ?
4.1. This has previously been copied to the Home Secretary, The Attorney General, The Lord Chief Justice, The Lord Chancellor -
-and -
that they also have hidden themselves, pretending it all doesn't exist. , surely makes these executives part of the conspiracy.
4.2. There are various replies from various executives of the state, but none that show adherence to job descriptions and the expectations of such jobs.
4.3. It is hardly surprising the country is saturated in crimes, but this is proof that the worst vile crimes resides happily right at the top of government. So much for all the petty excuses to give vile judges freedom from possible interference.

......the Devil walks freely in Chester......

5. The history is hard written. The walls will fall down.......eventually....and the severity of end response must be proportionate.
...................................................................................
18th Sep 2018. It was confirmed yesterday that the Crown Court has not ignored my submissions and evidence. This raises very serious problems for the Ministry of Justice about the unlawfulness and criminality being created by the Chester Courts. In response, I emailed Chester Crown Court, with copies to the Attorney General ( because this is extensive evidenced contempt of court - amongst other things , and , it is supposed to be within the remit of the AG to investigate and stop contempt of court, but so far he is happy to let the Chester Courts be run unlawfully) , copied to The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice because they have a responsibility for judges to behave lawfully and decently (which they are evidenced as not doing).

Email - ...............................................................

Dear XX YYYYYY, thank you for your reply. (admin name redacted)

(also submitted to Ministry of Justice, AG, LCJ, LC )
This reply raises more questions than it answers.
1. Why did judges and clerks in both magistrates and Crown courts tell me they did not read all documents submitted by me ?
2. Why did the judge in the Crown Court try to hold a summary judgement by not acknowledging the latest relevant submissions, but by only looking at the much earlier submissions sent from prison ?
3. Why have the police, CPS and judges in both courts repeatedly ignored the rape, sexual abuses, physical abuses, psychological abuses of my children, when it has been repeatedly submitted in unambiguous evidence ?
4. Why have the judges repeatedly ignored the evidenced crimes against me by police, CPS, judiciary ?
5. Why have there been evidenced repeated serious breaches of the human rights of my children and me ?
6. Why have both courts ignored the evidence of torture, and simply marched on regardless submitting me to more torture ?
7. It is not tenable that all these police, CPS and judiciary did not know they were carrying out crimes on a biblical scale.
8. The Crown Court in Chester cannot handle this case as it is being institutionally run by vile criminal external parties.
9. The current judge must immediately recuse himself, and the whole case be passed over to the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice and Attorney General.

..........................................................................
12th Sep 2018. On emailing the magistrates court to get details of what is recorded for the 11th July (I have witnesses, so it will be interesting to see what they try to hide), the court server (computer) reports it is bouncing emails from my Email address. So, I have emailed them from another account requesting an explanation why they are wilfully acting in contempt of court.

11th Sep 2018. Page links here updated and made more compact. This must be used now instead of all previous. The previous structure is fully archived following our audit trail requirement.

In the light of the Crown Court moving the date of the next trial management hearing, after receiving the email outlining the requirement of the judge to recuse himself based on impropriety and bringing the judiciary into disrepute, then it has now become necessary to also include the FSO within their remit from the Attorney General. Soon, there will be no honest, or competent, or morally decent people left representing the British Government. It is hardly surprising this cabal want to get far away from having outside authorities poking their noses into this very dirty English laundry.

6th Sep 2018. Submission to the highest legal people in UK.

Dear Ministry of Justice, please pass this on to -
The Rt Hon David Gauke MP
Ian Burnett, Baron Burnett of Maldon
The Rt Hon Geoffrey Cox QC MP
Robert Buckland QC MP
.......................

Dear All,
I am a British subject whose children have been
raped, sexually assaulted, physically abused, emotionally abused , falsely imprisoned
and
the judiciary in Chester have assisted in these crimes against my children,
and
in they have assisted and propagated a myriad of crimes against me - for exposing these crimes.
The evidence has more integrity than needed to back up what I am reporting.

I ask your intervention as specified below.
.......................................................................

Dear Clerk to the court (Chester Crown Court),

Please pass this on to the CPS and judge in the ULTRA VIRES case of Regina v Tom Dobbie.
1. The current judge must recuse himself.
2. He is evidenced as showing prejudice against the defendant.
3. He is evidenced as permitting and assisting in multiple breaches of Human Rights against the defendant.
3.1. Unfair trial.
3.2. Torture.
3.3. Right to live without fear.
3.4. Right to know his children are ok for the moment.
4. He has shown contempt of court in favour of criminality towards the defendant and his children.
5. The entire court and its infrastructure are evidenced as being repeatedly in contempt of court - hiding applications, hiding evidence, working from arbitrary documents - admitting they frequently lose emails and submissions.
6. I request the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice, the Attorney General all to intervene as this is not only within their remit, but is essential to their role within statute.
regards, Tom Dobbie

................................

31st July 2018. The events below recorded under 19th July leave the current Crown Court case needing considerable changes and a good dose of certainty. The application of the defendant will now have to be expanded to include the evidence, issues and witnesses that were going to be dealt with in the Magistrates Court. This means a much bigger trial than was envisaged by the judge on 26th June. The defendant makes his application to cover these new circumstances and includes actions to try and reduce the requirement for the extra witnesses.

19th July 2018. The CPS documents arrived in the post today. There is nothing different from all previous; yet again they have not disclosed the large number of highly evidenced crimes against my children and me. They have not taken any notice of the bizarre events at Chester Magistrates on 11th July, where the judge declared the charges against me as ultra vires and could neither hear the case or dismiss the case. He said all he could do was to send these facts back to the judge who had created this ultra vires situation, and told CPS that it had to go back to judge Dutton. There were a number of reasons that I knew of, that show why these acts by Cheshire Police are unlawful, but the judge in the Crown Court ( a man above the law in his own court) made his ruling why he says these did not amount to abuse of process.

26th June. Hearing for abuse of process at Chester Crown Court.
[ Link to judges brief notes for 26th June. ]
Defendant's notes below.
1. The judge started working from my earliest submission made from prison. He said he would make a summary judgment based on that. 
1.1. This was not the case I was here for based on the submissions I made.
2. I informed the judge and cps of the multiple communications which I had made after that first submission. The last one was the correct submission for the hearing . I also informed him that I had printed out copies of the main pages, annotated them, paginated them and handed these in to the Crown Court (receipt evidenced).
3. The judge and court staff now found my submissions by email and hardcopy.
4. We now turned to the primary matter on hand - the Abuse of Process Hearing.
5. This new judge seemed to be acting as an advocate in coming to the following directions -
5.1. This judge directed that even though this case by CPS is built on multiple evidenced acts of criminality of willful non disclosure,  this is irrelevant in law in this court in this case.
5.2. This judge directed that even though it is evidenced that children have been raped, sexually abused, battered, and other abuses, and, it is being assisted by police, is irrelevant in law in this court in this case.
5.3. This judge directed that even though the police are evidenced as having carried out theft, fraud, misconduct, torture, harassment etc , these are all irrelevant in law in this court in this case.
5.3.1. This judge directed that the police had not stolen my computers, but had legally taken them. This was a peculiar thing for him to say. He has seen no evidence from the police and my evidence trail with crime numbers shows distinct burglary and theft by Cheshire Police This judge says evidence of police criminality is irrelevant in law in this court in this case.
5.3.2. This particular comment from the judge is important, because it shows he is not acting as a judge, but is acting as an advocate to the benefit of the conspiracy with these police; covering things up for them.
5.4. This judge directed that the CBO being used as an instrument of crime, is irrelevant in law, in this court in this case.
5.5. This judge directed that the police refused to examine evidence offered to them by the defendant the judge says is not abuse of process.
5.6. This judge directed that even though the documents identified by the defendant to the interviewing police were the wrong documents, and that the police ignored this, this judge dismissed as 'they have the correct documents' and had no idea what documents the police used in the interviews. Worse, even he was using the wrong documents in this Crown Court at the start of today and the defendant had to point this out to him. We are in Kafka land yet again.

6. The abuse of process is dismissed , even though it sits on over 200 willful non disclosures perverting the course of justice and propagates crimes.

7. The judge directed that all that matters in this case is if the prosecution can prove 4 things -
7.1. That such an order as the CBO exists.
7.2. That Dobbie has been served with it ( the CBO is an order by the court preventing Dobbie from reporting crimes and abuses by Cheshire police - granted in the unlawful trial in 2017. That trial is accepted and evidenced as having no defence evidence at any stage. That trial had no jury. That trial had the defendant pronounced guilty by a judge who is an interested party to have the crimes covered up). 
7.3. That Dobbie wrote the emails reporting crimes by Cheshire police to the Attorney General.
7.4. That Dobbie sent the emails. 
8. I informed the judge that Archbold states that the charge is correctly 'did these things without Reasonable Cause'. (sending emails reporting crimes)'. 
8.1. There was then a period of bum scratching and looking at legal references by judge and prosecutor, followed by various reading out the legal definitions.
8.2. The judge went back to defend the prosecutors case, saying all the prosecutor had to do was prove the 4 things above.
8.3. I challenged the judge again on the charge of 'without reasonable cause'. It is stated as a primary requirement in law, that if the prosecutor brings the charge, the prosecutor needs to prove the charge.
8.3.1. The prosecutor needs to prove there was no reasonable cause. 
8.4. The judge responded that all the prosecutor needed to do, was the 4 points he made previously.
8.4.1.I say this is unlawful, and the judge is wrong in law. However, this is a game of shadows and the judge is above the law in his own court. 
8.5. The judge says it is up to a jury to decide if or not there was reasonable cause.
8.6. I'm happy with this as proceeding now, as I have over a hundred reasonable causes to report crimes by Cheshire Police. 
8.6. The judge knows I have a hundred or so reasons for putting forward as 'reasonable cause' . So, he warns me that any evidence from previous trials and events will almost certainly be excluded in the allowed evidence.
8.6.1. The history cannot removed if bad character evidence is introduced.  
9. The rest of the time was taken up with planning the trial with various events and submissions before the real trial taking place around January 2019. 
10. I felt very sick on the way home, and had to let myself pass out on the bus (people just think your sleeping). 
10.1. Why was I ill ? All these people, all their effort - all to keep my children and me in criminal abuse.
10.2. This is what   it feels like having my children abused a thousand times over 8 years - all while these people get highly paid and dress up in batman cloaks and wigs - all to cover up crimes and child abuses.
10.3. I truly am in an occupied territory; just like millions previous and current, but, at least I have a fighting chance in a game of shadows.

22nd June 2018. The Crown Court has for the first time since 11th May sent an Email to Tom Dobbie. Dobbie has sent a number of Emails previously without any replies; even using resolver to try and chase up any response from the court.
The court now wishes to consider moving the abuse of process hearing to Warrington on 29th June. The defendant fully opposes such a move on the grounds of -
1. The defendant is unwell physically and mentally, to such a degree that getting to Warrington and back is too distressing. He very rarely comes out of his tiny flat; this residence situation being forced on him by the abusers destroying his business, destroying his personal finances, stealing his home, making him homeless - all these acts evidenced as criminal, that Cheshire police assisted in. The defendant is a primary mental health patient, with this situation being caused by the abusers acting criminally.
2. The defendant has no money and lives hand to cap, he is currently worried as his last pair of trousers are coming apart at the backside. The journey to Warrington is excessive wear and tear on this last pair of trousers as well as more expensive than the journey to Chester Crown Court .
3. The evidenced history over the ~ 100 cases involving Tom Dobbie in Chester courts shows these courts as being repeatedly brought into gross disrepute by acts of the executive. It is essential for the Chester Courts to demonstrate that they are no longer tolerating unlawfulness or putting their cronies above the law. Justice must be done and be seen to be done. This case is a chance for Chester Crown Court to show it has moved away from what has been evidenced so far as bringing the judiciary into gross disrepute.
4. The bulk of the witnesses are much closer to Chester Crown Court, and this not only is much less disruptive, but cheaper for all involved.
5. The defendant had noted the day of the abuse of process hearing as the 26th June while on videolink from HMP Altcourse. The trial day seems to have moved to the 29th. There has been no mention previously of the trial date from Chester Crown Court moving to the 29th - I don't oppose this date of the 29th at Chester Crown Court. Although there is the issue of there being no trial preparation; the defendant tried to communicate with the court, cps and police, but nobody has replied to anything - apart from my bike being stolen, which generated a visit from Cheshire police.
In trial preparation, I have submitted a list of witnesses, but the arrangements for witnesses has not been addressed - especially the witness who previously has been threatened not to tell anyone about these crimes.
6. The defendant has submitted an N244 to have the case stay at Chester Crown Court.
7. The previous N244 submitted to Chester Crown Court to apply for an injunction to stop Cheshire Police interfering with the course of justice is also outstanding, with no responses after a month.

20th June 2018. Please excuse any duplication. The defendant is forced to be a litigant in person because of the previous unlawful trials with currupt defence solicitors and barristers. While forced to be a LIP, the defendant's mind is always in a state of anxiety because of the abuses of his children and himself; forced repeatedly to type all this stuff out, the defendant faces a torrent of distress - which is mostly because he cannot understand how it is possible for overt criminality by the authorities against his children and himself to just keep spiralling on.
Due to the critical update on 13th July, a lot of restructuring of the defendants application, notes and skeleton arguments has had to take place. The previous applications still hold in content, and both old and new, address [h-001] CPR requirements for abuse of process, but are now dispersed inside the new structure, with neccessary additions and clarifications. The CPR requirements for the content of the application, as described in [h-002] Annex 2, are met here, albeit in a non contiguous manner. The current content on this web type structure is the master copy.
The older version of this 2018 submission in the abuse of process and any downstream cases is still available for audit and referencing.
The 2017 bundle, and it's audit trail, are still available. This is the bundle that judge Dutton refused twice, and the barrister and solicitor for the defence admitted they never looked at any defence evidence, and never carried out any signed instructions from their client, the defendant. This is evidenced as without a proper trial, and the defendant guilty for reporting crimes, and guilty for reporting police who are evidenced as covering up crimes. The 2017 trial with no evidence allowed, no jury, and on the say so of a judge whose mistress wanted the defendant silenced is available for public scrutiny as required by statute.
In simple terms, if Chester judges want to be evil, the public must be allowed to see their evil acts; and in particular, their abuses of a defendant who is exposing them and their conspirators.
The 2015 bundle, and it's audit trail, are still available. This bundle shows extensive abuses of the children and Tom Dobbie, by the primary abusers, the police and cps. That CPS applied wrongfully for an injunction immediately on acquital in 2015 was not just [h001] unlawfully granted, but a deliberate abuse of process and perverting of the course of justice by the CPS prosecutor.
These are some parts of the extensive abuse of process and abuse of power and misconduct in public office that has resulted in us being in these 2018 trials.

CRITICAL UPDATE. on 13th June 2018.
To date,[h002] no responses to emails and [003] applications to Chester Crown Court, Chester Magistrates, Cheshire Police have been recieved, other than Cheshire Police arresting me twice and remanding me in order to stop me exposing crimes; and also to stop me attending the [004] Simon Byrne hearing.
This has necessitated a more comprehensive layout and linking of eveidence etc. as no doubt CP (Cheshire Police) will arrest me again to stop crimes being evidenced. CP arrest Tom Dobbie again and again to stop him exposing the crimes that CP are determined to act criminally in covering up. CP and Chester CPS then repeatedly pervert the course of justice by saying Tom Dobbie is commiting crimes. The CPS prosecutor at the last Crown Court appearance was saying to the judge that Dobbie should not be given bail because he will not stop reporting these crimes; crimes that the prosecutor is criminally covering up completely against what is evidenced.
The previous application to the court is fully archived and available, in line with my auditing policy.
...............................................................................
There is some very sensitive evidence that will not be shown on these pages or links to these pages. This evidence will only be shown in court and on request without the public seeing it. CPS will not be given this evidence because they are evidenced as criminals perverting the course of justice all through these trials. If the judge sees it necessary, then a copy will be given to CPS on the condition it is never shared without the express permission of a high court judge.
...................................................................................

1. All of this miniature set of internally linked html files, is the electronic version of any PDF documents sent to the courts in Chester, as skeleton arguments, submissions, applications, evidence, notes.
1.1. There is a [005] PDF file that has this page and those on the left hand menu assembled as a contiguous document. The text in the pdf copy will always be seen, but depending on where the pdf version is accessed from, some of the hyperlinks may not work. If you are accessing the pdf via the live url's, or from the CD/DVD copy local on your computer, then the links should work. If not, you can get back to this web structured version.
1.2. The defendant has over forty years of high level presentations across the globe, mostly to academic level audiences. It was originally typed documents, acetates, chalk and board markers in the early days. As technology enabled more efficient resources, the defendant used all modern means to communicate.
The move from linearly contiguous documentation, to highly branched using hyperlinks was considered the highest level. However, there was the penalty of ambiguity increasing as the hyperlinks count went up, and the audiences ability went down.
Hyperlinked documentation, including web based systems, have a very high efficience for saying things that can easily get garbled as the number of ideas or facts or propositions get higher. So, hyperlinked documentation is much preferred, as long as there is always someone available to act as a guide when things get very complex.
This current case before Chester Crown Court and Chester Magistrates Court has a ten year history involving hundreds of thousands of documents. However, it is an auditor's dream on the defendant side, because he records and files everything due to his historical position as a consultant physicist and CEO. This is evidentially not the case with Cheshire Police or Chester CPS who repeatedly hide evidence that damns their case and exposes their criminality in abuse of power, abuse of process and perverting the course of justice.
2. Any media files and documents (e.g. evidence ) can be downloaded from here, or from CD roms/DVD roms sent to the court.
2.1. The defendants application is incomplete without the linked documents being included. Cheshire police repeatedly follow hyperlinks if it can be used against a defendant, and they ignore hyperlinks in documents as a method of deliberate and wilful non disclosure. This is repeatedly evidenced in all of Tom Dobbie's submissions, and even in the emails and web pages they download as prosecution evidence. This non disclosure behaviour by Cheshire Police and CPS is endemic [h006] across all 10 years of their involvement in the Dobbie cases. This demonstrates criminal behaviour and a large number of acts of perverting the course of justice.
2.2. To stop these wilful non disclosures, all of the more important hyperlinks here in this application and it's main supporting pages, will be numbered inside square brackets e.g. [003]. The numbers will be contiguous, but not necessarily in page order. Some hyperlinks may be added later, but the [h007] hyperlink audit trail shows when they are added.
3. This work is additional to the previous application and does not replace it.

Corruption, abuse of power, abuse of process.

A. Tom Dobbie has repeatedly informed both the Crown Court and Magistrates Court that -
A1. There has been no traceable hardcopy documents or traceable feedback from the Crown Court or Magistrates Court.
A2. There has been no receipt of any electronic documentation from the court or CPS, even after requests for copies by email for everything.
A3. It was presented and explained by Tom Dobbie in his Emails that traceable electronic copies were wanted to ensure an audit trail and to ensure we are all using the same document.
A4. CPS from the Crown Court appear to have posted some hardcopy documents, but these cannot be verified as there are no electronic copies or traceability or responses to requests to clarify.
A5. Repeated requests, and an [008] N244 application to Chester Crown Court to - -
.......A5.1. to prevent further interference with the cource of justice by Cheshire Police on Tom Dobbie's court documents and reporting of evidenced crimes,
........A5.2. to prevent further torture, harassment, theft by Cheshire Police on Tom Dobbie,
- - have been completely ignored by the Crown Court.
A5.3. The defendant is left yet again put in a state of anxiety, not knowing if he will be arrested into custody yet again for reporting evidenced crimes, or arrestsed for frivolous matters like 'arrested into overnight custody for having made a possibly sinister laugh'. I have [h009] asked Cheshire police for copies of all arrest interviews, and still they refuse. If you check the records, there are a lot of frivolous actions by Cheshire Police designed to harass Tom Dobbie.
A5. The magistrates sent documentation, but Cheshire Police made sure I could not respond to it in a timely manner by arresting me, assaulting me, keeping me overnight in distress and anxiety, and sending me the following day to Crewe Magistrates knowing full well the matter could not be dealt with there, and that I would yet again be [h010] assaulted ,[h011] health deteriorated and made more anxious while gagged and remanded to Altcourse. Before being forced to leave Blacon and attend Crewe, I asked the police not to send me to a court knowing full well that court could not attend to the matter and they were merely abusing police power to have me remanded again.
A5.1. When I was bailed from Altcourse 30 days later, my medications at zero and a delay of almost a week to get new supplies (with resulting distress and anxiety), my bike was stolen, all of my food wasted in fridge and freezer (electricity ran out) and my benefits (ESA) stopped, and benefits lost, and a new application meant a reduction from ESA to Tax Credits. All caused by the abusive and reckless acts of Cheshire Police.
A5.2. The documents sent by the magistrates are scanned [h012] and available for your inspection. There are multiple problems with the magistrates documents and new documents requested. Nothing is acknowledged or has arrived.
A6. The police were requested to reply to the validity of their investigations into these matters. This is a very serious matter, as the truth is evidenced that Cheshire police have repeatedly refused to demonstrate that their investigations and actions fall within policy and guidelines, and that is how highly evidenced crimes are being covered up by Cheshire police.
A6.1. The police have [h013] repeatedly refused to demonstrate or reply on the issue of their non compliance. They have refused every single request for meetings to go over the evidence, and blocked communications.
A6.2. Cheshire police even assisted the paedophile,[h014] by telling the victim to stop telling people about the paedophile or her mother's abuses to the children.
A6.3. Cheshire police admitted on numerous written documents that they never investigated. Even with documents originating from Cheshire police that say [h015] investigations never happened, their [h016] PPS insist there were investigations that found no crimes; they say this without proof, and without a single bit of evidence to show that they followed procedures.
Corrupt Cheshire police say this[h017] CAFCASS report doesn't exist.
Corrupt Cheshire police say this [h018] statement by the abuser doesn't exist.
Corrupt Cheshire police say this [h019] witness and[xxx] transcription doesn't exist.
Corrupt Cheshire police say this [h020] SocialServices report doesn't exist.
Corrupt Cheshire police say this [h021] is Graham not reporting assault
Corrupt Cheshire police say Graham never reported anything and [h022] kept his evidence hidden, as did CPS when applying for the unlawful injunction in 2015,
and there are many more documents and media and witnesses that show Cheshire Police have behaved criminally to assist and propagate crimes and hide evidence and torture Tom Dobbie, the man trying to rescue his children and having to expose these criminals in doing so.
A6.3.1. There is also the issue that a number of psychiatrists report that they have examined me, accessed the evidence, talked to witnesses, and they say everything I am saying is true.
So, [h023] highly intelligent psychiatrists say yes, while[h024] IQ of evidenced low abilities police say no.
The evidence suggests that these Cheshire police are -
1. not up to the intelligence required to do the job, or
2. are up to the intelligence, but are grossly incompetent, or
3. they are criminals, or
4. some combination e.g. stupid, incompetent criminals.
My opinion is 4, but you can take your pick bearing in mind the copious evidence of repeated, wilful, obtuse, criminal acts.
A6.3.2. The people wilfully authorising the crimes against Tom Dobbie, his children and the Crown are [h025] D.Keane, [h026] J.McCormick, [h027] J.Dwyer, [h028] Nick Bailey,[h029] Kevin Bennett,[h030] Inspector Dodds, [h031] Christopher Freeman-Dean, [h032] Miles Dignam, and others (to be supplied along with the evidence).
A6.3.3. Of course, they couldn't have done it alone if CPS were not corrupt. Of course they could not do it alone without the wilful help of people like judge Dutton. So, according to UK law, we have a criminal conspiracy.
A6.4. A request to the Crown Court for the Court to issue the instructions to Cheshire Police[h033] to supply evidence that they followed procedures in these matters has also been ignored.
A6.5. Cheshire police burgled Tom Dobbie's flat and stole evidence that showed Cheshire Police acting criminally. They have been investigating themselves on this for over a year. A recent development was that Cheshire police lied about this burglary and the computers stolen to another witness, who is the actual owner of the stolen laptop. Cheshire police replied with lies, and when informed of evidence showing they are lying, they say they will investigate on a[h034] very long timescale.
A6.6. One of the primary witnesses - Graham Dean - reported the abuses to Cheshire police on a number of occassions. He was a witness in the 2015 Crown Court hearing where Tom Dobbie was acquitted of stalking, because Tom Dobbie reported the crimes by the child abusers. CPS, having already covered up [h035] evidence , listened to witnesses, seen [h036] some of the evidence of [h037] child rape, child sexual abuses, child battering, theft, harassment, threats to kill and more, then acted criminally in order to gag Tom Dobbie from reporting these crimes and exposing CPS and police as having victimised the victims. CPS had an injunction unlawfully applied [h038] (case law) immediately in a 5 min ad hoc meeting after the last day of the case). Cheshire police deemed it so serious, they video interviewed Graham and said they would follow up. Cheshire police buried the [h039] video evidence.
A6.6.1. A recent complaint as to the vanishing evidence, again had Cheshire police lying about what had happened. They said they asked the assailant child abuser if what Graham was reporting was true. Of course the criminal said no and Cheshire Police accepted the criminal's answer - even though Graham's evidence tied in with the children victims and with [h040] CAFCASS and with [h041] social services and with the assailant child abusers own [h042] previous admissions. Graham was so disgusted by Cheshire police he made [h043] a version of his statements public, and will be a witness at the next Chester trials.
A7. The police all the way through this have victimised the victims. The arrests, the [h044] court cases, the hiding of evidence, the hiding of witnesses, the [h045] unlawful injunction, the false malicious communication charges (notice how they got this without these police being questioned, or even stating that they had told lies), the CBO are all evidenced as designed to cover up the criminality by Cheshire police and Chester CPS, and[h046] CWAC. [h047] (example)
This is a genuine evidenced conspiracy and must be dealt with as serious crimes by the real police. Crimes commited include the perverting of the course of justice, interfering with evidence, misconduct in public office, torture, and many more. The abuse of the process of the court, along with the scale of the contempt by this consiracy, is very large in depth and breadth.

Legal position of current police, cps and court actions

There is no integrity to the acts of Police, CPS and Chester Crown Court in these matters. There has been no trial preparation that resembles a reasonable working court of law.
It all resembles exactly how Cheshire police go about their business. When they arrested Tom Dobbie and interrogated him, there was evidence Tom Dobbie was carrying with him that would have addressed the police concerns. The Cheshire police officers on both instances refused to let any evidence, other than what they had, to be on the table or seen. They both even refused to acknowledge evidence against their case on the very emails they were using as prosecution evidence.
On Tom Dobbie informing these officers that they did not have the correct version of documentation, they made grunty noises at Tom Dobbie and carried on regardless.
These were acts of clear abuse of power and process.

There is no lawfulness in the construction of this case, and the charges against the defendant should be dismissed. However, a judicial review must be undertaken to understand how such a state of incompetence and non compliance is possible.

The judiciary need to ask themselves how 10 years worth of criminality, involving around [h048] 110 court appearances in Chester, has just been rolled up and rolled over - right in front of their noses. In ALL cases, there was [h049] gross inequality of arms. The matter needs sorting out now. These cover ups and criminality have dragged Chester judiciary into gross disrepute.
Lets be clear, Tom Dobbie is the one who is standing up for truth and lawfulness, and the people hell bent on stopping him are covering up crimes; nasty, vicious crimes. That is why Tom Dobbie has been forced into communicating with the Attorney General, The Lord Chancelor, The Lord Chief Justice and the Home Secretary. The iiCSA is involved because right at the heart of all of these crimes lies the repeated covering up of child sexual abuses and child abuses.

I am still having the case in the magistrates continue, because there will be hard evidence and witnesses that Cheshire Police and Chester CPS have carried out a multitude of criminal acts.

In the event that the Crown case continues, I will supply all of the evidence and witnesses showing why it is not only reasonable to have reported acts by Cheshire constabulary to the higher authorities, but is evidentially necessary. It would be unlawful not to have reported these matters; the conspiracy across Cheshire police, CPS and CWAC would have included Tom Dobbie if he had not reported them.

2017 Bundle contents of previous submission

This link is currently disabled here, and will only come into use if and when the current case goes past the abuse of process hearing.
The previous appearance in the Crown Court was and is evidentially unlawful - no disclosures, no evidence, no jury, corrupt defence barrister paid off to act as prosecution. Judge Dutton accepts the defence evidence was missing throughout the entire trial and that the defence barrister and defence solicitors admitted under oath that they have never looked at any defence evidence. Judge Dutton refuses the bundle - twice. He was witnessed as slamming down the screen with some of the defence evidence on it.
Judge Dutton was an interested party, and should never have been given the power to adjudicate if or not Tom Dobbie's equivocal plea was irreversibly unequivocal. It is evidenced that Judge Dutton went in the opposite direction to the evidence, and went in the direction to please his mistress and other CWAC cronies ([h050] Vanessa Whiting who not only got [h051] Dutton his position of the recorder of Chester, but she was party to defrauding the public purse to get an injunction to stop Dobbie reporting CWAC's parts in the crimes against his children and him. This particular abuse of process ended with Judge Pearce recusing himself and all traces of the set of hearings to vanish. ).
All of this needs to go on TV in front of the public; it is the only way to stop this endemic corruption of the justice system. Statute says it should be open and transparent to the scrutiny of the public - and Cheshire police, Chester CPS and Chester Judiciary have done everything to cover it all up.

My 'legals' and I still have copies of everything safe on secure servers and in secure locations.

End of page