2018/19 Crimes page
Administration
A1. A complete re allocating of the hyperlink numbers on this page was carried out on 24th June to improve readability and auditing.
Overview.
1. There are a large number of crime types, crimes, victims and perpetrators in this case. Dobbie invented a method of laying out a clear summary for this kind of situation which he names [c001] 'the Chester Matrix' - a device useful for clearly understanding not only the crimes and abuses here, but those found in multi victim situations like Rotherham, Rochdale, Wrexham etc.
By linking the Chester matrix, the theorem of probable causes, and considering both discrete and continuous measurements/descriptors, we have the most elegant way of [c002] describing the multiplicity of crimes carried out by the corrupt employees within Cheshire authorities against Dobbie, his children and the Crown.
Dobbie has previously tried to make a simpler version of this layed out [c003] like the scales of justice, but judge Dutton et al failed to comprehend this simpler layout.
If this is far beyond the intellectual comprehension evidenced in the police and cps reporting, then to make use of it, we need to remove both the criminals and the people from the dark ages, and replace them with both moral people, and better value for money people.
2. The primary original criminal operated over the last 20 years in [c004] domestic violence and domestic [c005] abuses against her children and her husband. She was then joined by a [c006] pedophile with criminal intent in late 2010. Together, they ensured they covered up the child abuses, destroyed [c007] Tom Dobbie's business, and used the police to act as a proxy in carrying out further harassments, theft and abuses. The police obliged for two main reasons -
2.1. Cheshire police had made a huge mistake in victimising the victims based on their [c008] prejudice in domestic violence. Cheshire police pps reported that they had spoken to social services (report CO\195\11 : almost a year later) who said Mr Dobbie was never considered to be the primary carer and no previous violence had been recorded by the mother. That social services lied to the police (or the police just made it up ; as they are all closely self protecting) as can be clearly seen from the [c009] previous social workers report, and the violent abusive mum's own [c010] initial admission in writing, and later [c011] CAFCASS reporting, and, even the [c012] child's reporting and the older brother Graham reporting these crimes since 2010. Cheshire Police were given a copy of the document showing almost a hundred criminal acts by CWAC, which they ignored (CWAC complaint is restricted because it is difficult to protect the childrens names, but a copy is available to the court). CPS and Cheshire police knew of Graham's evidence at numerous points, including the 2015 Crown Court trial. Cheshire police later considered Graham's reporting [c013] so serious in [c014] 2016 they videod him, and then they buried the evidence. When a complaint was raised a few months ago about why nothing had been done in over two years, Cheshire police subsequently lied. When the lies were demonstrated to them, they have now said they will investigate again, but it will take a very long time.
With so much evidence available showing clearly this mum was a prolific abuser, how did Cheshire police get it all so wrong ? One answer is that they are not just dishonest, but lazy. It is easy for them to follow the popular prejudice spread in hating men.
2.2. Cheshire Police are evidenced as having had a [c015] policy of spreading hatred of men in situations involving domestic disputes or domestic violence. These police, amongst many things, act as a political body that spreads its own [c016] propaganda in preference to [c017] reality. They find it easy to get 'brownie points' from piggybacking the femminist hatred of men. They deny [c018] reality even when it is well documented by nearly all credible [c019] modern reporters and researchers.
3.
The authorities got involved primarily starting in[c020] 2009, with their criminality starting and escalating from July 2010 with Cheshire Police not investigating a domestic violence situation. They never followed procedure, but simply followed their standard procedure of assuming the man is the perpetrator - thus victimising the victims; victimising children and their dad. With the police getting it wrong, social services now buried their previous reports, changed the social workers, and completely reversed what they were recording. Compare social services first report [c021] CH2010 and [c022] CAFCASS, with the later [c023] HJChronology. It is quite evident that Helen Jones (CWAC social worker) lied in almost totality. She did this again [c024] and again, even ignoring [c025] other professionals requesting proper investigations. [c026] All of the CWAC social workers repeatedly perjured, lied and abused.
********************************************
this last hyperlink is to a document of extensive crimes by CAD/KR/CWAC.
In the most bizarre fashion, Cheshire police used this extensive evidence of crimes, to abuse the reporter of the crimes. This is non disclosure of evidence by Cheshire police and Chester CPS on a scale hard to imagine. How is it possible that this went to trial and judges approved it going to trial ? Here is the hard evidence of the criminal conspiracy of the executives of the justice system.
Note to Cheshire Police. You cannot rush round and arrest me yet again for having this evidence. It was in the 2015 trial in the Chester Crown Court
and was public evidence, in a trial in which I was acquitted, and you, Cheshire Police and CPS are evidenced as going beyond wilful non disclosure and into gross misconduct. Let's chat about that with the judge.
********************************************
The document is also the evidence of misconduct in public office by Steve Robinson and Gerald Meehan.
The chief executive of CWAC cleverly lied to [c027] MP Andrew Miller , by saying they had stopped investigating the complaints, but implying the complaints had been dealt with properly;[c027] which the chief executive knew to be lies. MP Justin Madders was lied to by Gerald Meehan of CWAC in exactly the same way; however, Madders had an interest to assist CWAC cover up because they are his wife's employer. CWAC lied to the police at the Janet Pattison PPS level and all the way up to the most senior officers of Cheshire police. Cheshire police were clearly [c028] informed about the lies, but simply sided with their cronies in CWAC and Freemasons and perverted the course of justice. It is reported frequently about social services perverting the course of justice in the family court free for alls.
Note: It is not possible for Cheshire police to say that they have investigated in line with policy and procedures while all of the child abuses and other crimes are reliably evidenced. Cheshire police are saying the evidence does not exist, or worse, what is evidenced is acceptable to Cheshire police making them wholly authors of child rape, child sexual abuses, child battering, theft, fraud, threats to kill, torture, harassment etc.
When Cheshire police gave full protection to CAD to abuse her children, this created the environment where the children were now in harms way, and the [c029] rape and further assaults now took place as a consequence of the police negligence. This initially was fought in the courts and [c030] dad got full custody again in 2011 . Dad got full custody previously in 2006 when mum was evidenced as abusive and lying lots in the courts.
All of this was now a big problem for Cheshire police and CWAC who were both now evidenced as not only having got it all wrong, but viciously abusing dad and allowing the children to be abused. Cheshire West now criminally harassed dad dragging him through 26 court appearances until Judge Barnett wilfully sided with the authorities,[c031] covered up the rape and assaults, and put the children back with the abusers. The crimes spiraled out of control with police, CWAC and courts all trying to bury that they had victimised the victims. [c032] Cheshire police repeatedly covered up, and their pps simply lied (an easy example, they say DI Nigel Parr investigated everything when it is [c033] documented by him in a number of different emails that he did not). Cheshire police repeatedly perverted the course of justice and the upper management formed a wilful conspiracy to bully and harass and abuse Dobbie and his children. These authorities demonstrated self serving as their primary activity.
4. There was a brief period of police abuses in 2006 that sets the flavour of how Cheshire police go about behaving criminally [c034] (see cava, which is full of errors, but starts in 2006 with police assisting CAD in a crime with powers of arrest, but they don't arrest her, instead, they assault dad, before discovering they have made a mess, and then they return daughter to dad ).
5. The primary abusers and the authorities crimes have continued through to date with -
5.1. Over [c035] 110 court appearances.
5.2. Over 15 arrests into overnight custody.
5.3. Remanded into Altcourse 5 times totaling around 2 years - all to gag the victim from reporting these crimes.
5.3.1. Cheshire police arrested Dobbie on the night before his 2015 Crown Court trial. Overnight detention, assault and torture
at Blacon, followed by each night of the trial with Dobbie remanded into assault and torture at HMP Altcourse. Judge Woodward was lied to by the authorities when Dobbie reported the assaults. Judge Woodward later had to appologise to the Jury for misleading them over Dobbie's state of detention. This was Cheshire Police yet again abusing power to assist CPS in trying to cover up the exposure of their conspiracy of crimes.
5.4. Malicious and unlawful injunctions and CBO designed to stop the victim exposing these crimes. The original [c036] CBO application by Cheshire police is an extraordinary document for abuse of a victim.
5.5. The [c037] burglary and theft by Cheshire police to steal evidence exposing their criminality.
6. The authorities put the children into [c038] coercive control and [c039] manipulative control by their abusers. This was to stop the children reporting these crimes. The police knew of all of this, and more, evidence, but they covered this up in non disclosures, abuse of power and abuse of process.
6.1. My daughter was taken out of school[c040] because she was telling people about her abuses. It was explicitly stated in family court orders that my daughter must not be taken out of school.
6.2. The children have been isolated and gagged for over 3 years.
7.
Many of these crimes are perpetrated in order to[c041] silence the victims.
8. iiCSA and other bodies have had an extensive reporting of all this, but remain helpless in the face of Cheshire police, Chester CPS and judiciary, CWAC all conspiring to keep all of this covered up.
The extensive list of wilful non disclosures.
Overview of non disclosures.[c042]
One mistake is possibly excusable, but hundreds of
mistakes are wilful, and can only be a conspiracy of crimes.
Cheshire police, Chester CPS and Chester Judiciary
are fully systematised to participate in non disclosures and
cover ups; that is the conclusion from a very well recorded
history of these cases over 10 years. The documents are all
available for anyone to see.
That's how they get their convictions rate increased.
They con the
public into thinking that they are doing a good job,
when the reality
is that these authorities
are saturated with criminality and
wilfully
perverting the course of justice.
The above statement is based on [c043] 10 years of interacting
with a bunch of con men in power, and facing absurdities
in numerous courts and meetings.
There are many similarities to
[c044] Rotherham, Rochdale, [c045] Wrexham, Hillsborough and all the
other cases - thus showing the repeated excuses 'lessons learned' is folly at best, but more likely a boilerplate escape for criminals.
These systems exist, not because they cannot think correctly,
they exist because the endemic culture is self centred.
When Judge Pearce was saying that a penis forced into a child's mouth
is not a crime, who was he but a disgrace to the judiciary. He was
putting his mates first and the child is just a casualty.
The [c046] Rotherham, the [c047] New South Wales and all the other enquiries seek to pander to powerful people, by blaming 'the system'. These matters of failure are not about systems, they are about what is carried culturally by the individuals employed.
One of the scary things over these last 10 years, is the number of times the public have been conned, even though these criminally and abusive disingenuous arguments being used by those in power, are really easy to see.
Let me make it clear, I am the one exposing criminality,
and I am the one trying to stop the judiciary being
dragged through gross disrepute.
These corrupt people in power tried to con
everyone into
believing I was deluded. So, I asked to be tested.
Top psychiatrists examined me and were allowed to see
the evidence and
talk to witnesses. Their conclusion
in writing was I am not
deluded, and what I am reporting
has more than sufficient
evidence.
The corrupt police and corrupt judges just shrug
their shoulders, smirk and say 'inadmissible'. There is the
power of corruption easily demonstrated.
[c048] |
The theorem of probable causes is a precise and concise way of looking at what ' reasonable causes' could be considered in necessitating any possible action. |
| Cheshire police in their desperation to gag Tom Dobbie from exposing the criminality of Cheshire police, make an absurd claim that they have tested all possible causes. Their ignorance should worry you greatly, because they are doing this horror story all over the place. | |
The law states that - the burden of proof is on the one making the charge, and so Cheshire police and CPS have brought a man before these courts by stating they have looked at every possible cause; a statement that shows extreme arrogance as well as stupidity. However, in the defence of Dobbie, he goes further than depending on the logical nonsense of the argument put forward by Cheshire police, and evidences high levels of abuse of process, and high levels of criminal acts against him and his children by the very police bringing the charges, and that necessitates invoking higher authorities above Cheshire police.
More detailed reporting of some of the crimes.
Can be demonstrated immediately to court and other authorities by Tom Dobbie and his audit trail of evidence. Police already have much of it, but they have buried it.
Particular evidence to be added here as required.
End of page